Bitcoin 6706.59$ (-0.17%)
Ethereum 240.62$ (0.39%)
Ripple 0.57$ (-2.6%)
Connecting excellent projects with the right investors
We move ICO analysis to the next level
Investors get answers fast, discover promising opportunities and underline the key risks of upcoming ICOs. Companies attract new investors, get recommendations for further development, and provide the current investors with reliable analysis.
Comprehensive assessment of ICOs
119Past ICOs 7Ongoing ICOs 53Upcoming ICOs
Description
Period
Raising funds
Risks
Score
Links
PDX
PDX creates a next-generation public blockchain for infrastructure.
Start
17.07.2018
End
18.07.2018
$ 10 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

- Competition in the sphere of scalable dApp-protocols is more severe than in others, so it has to be taken into consideration.

- The existing blockchains, though not as scalable as Alza might become, still have first- mover advantage and might be better off if they introduce scalability features, such as Lightning network, Sharding, Plasma, State Channels.

Product

- Low GItHub activity.

- Testnet is not available for public.

- There is no explanation on what the base consensus algorithm will be.

- PDX aims to create a blockchain for small amd medium-size businesses. However, the team members do not have experience in working with such businesses.

Team

- Several team members experience cannot be validated.

- None of the team members has blockchain experience.

Model

- The token role description is vague.

Finance

- There will be only 20% of the tokens available for sale. 80% of the tokens will be reserved by the project.

- Lenovo Capital investment in PDX can't be validated.

- The company valuation of $60M seems too high.

3.4
Medium
BOLT
Bolt is building a decentralized mobile-focused video content platform.
Start
18.09.2018
End
22.09.2018
$ 12 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

- The market for online entertainment content is quite saturated and has several large players, including YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, and others.

Product

- The mainnet of the underlying Blockchain - Zilliqa - has not been launched yet. There is no guarantee that it will be launched as expected.

- The product usecase is weak and does not seem to overtake YouTube.

- The requirement to pay fees for the YouTube-like service makes the use-case feasibility even lower.

- The roadmap is mediocre.

Team

- Overall the team does not seem outstanding.

- The fact of co-founding "Channel 9" by one of the team members cannot be validated.

- The team is scattered around UK, Hong Kong, and Malaysia.

- There are no people with blockchain experience within the team.

- There are no advisors from Zilliqa while BOLT aims to launch its platform on their blockchain platform.

Model

- NEP-5 tokens are supported on far less exchanges than ERC-20 tokens and usually suffer from low liquidity.

- The fact that users can pay with fiat money or Bolt tokens could limit token adoption. Even though there are savings to be made by paying with tokens, people tend to stick to what they know.

Finance

- DApps generally have low upside potential in terms of market cap.

- The valuation of $30M is quite high for a dApp.

3.2
Medium
PayGine
PayGine is an open financial platform with an open API used to operate within its proprietary banking structure to serve FinTech and crypto-business.
Start
18.06.2018
End
17.08.2018
$ 30 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

There are plenty of similar projects that were trying to issue the same solutions but did not succeed. The services provided by PayGine have already been introduced by Revolut and is in active development and global expansion.

Product

The idea is not unique and several other larger projects already working on the same solutions for a while. It is unclear what has been done by Best2Pay and PayGine separately. There are legal risks pegged to the bank acquisition procedure. The current stage of PayGine development is unclear.

Team

There are no people with blockchain experience within the team. Most of the team members have corporate management experience and did not start and scale companies by themselves. The team members are scattered around different time zones. They live in Florida, Singapore, Moscow, Donetsk, and Saint Petersburg.

Model
N/A
Finance

The range between Soft and Hard Cap is quite high and equals to $27M. When compared to the similar projects, the valuation seems too high. Only 27% of the tokens will be available for sale. Most of the ICO collected funds - almost 65% - will be used for a bank acquisition. There are huge bonuses (up to 20%) for the public sale participants.

2.8
Low
Fysical
Fysical is the infrastructure for the transparent and compliant exchange of location data.
Start
01.07.2018
End
10.07.2018
$ 18 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

A lot of location data is freely available for most usecases. The biggest part of location data is owned and used within huge corporations.

Product

Last information about numbers of transaction is dated Oct 2017. There is no opportunity to freely use the final product of Fysical or Fysical Labs. Only landing pages is available. No information of app, which provides an location data or about any buyers.

Team

Not clear the role of founders of Fysical Labs in new project Fysical. Almost no technical team.

Model

According to information on site, currently marketplace model is not balanced. (only 20 buyers and 1000+ suppliers)

Finance

There is no clear mechanism for token value growth.

2.6
Low
Bottr
Bottr is an ecosystem powered by smart messaging that rewards you for doing and sharing with others what you love and know.
Start
17.03.2018
End
30.04.2018
$ 2 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Competition on chatbots market is huge, only the best project will survive.

Product

For some reasons, responses in current chatbots are extremely slow.

Team

CEO and Founder have only corporative experience.

Model
N/A
Finance

The monetization of the chatbots would not happen in near future.

3.4
Medium
Telegram Open Network (TON)
Telegram Open Network (TON) is a fast and inherently scalable multi-blockchain architecture. TON can be regarded as a decentralized supercomputer and value transfer system. By combining minimum transaction time with maximum security, TON can become a VISA/Mastercard alternative for the new decentralized economy.
Start
01.03.2018
End
01.04.2018
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

There are already tons of large players in the market, ranging from banking wallets (CitiPay) to Fintechs (PayPal, Venmo). ",
            TON has direct competitors across different services the company would like to build  from messaging to decentralized VPN services.
As of Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism, it\u2019s also in several large Blockchain projects, including Ethereum, immediate roadmap.

Product

The main product risk for TON is that many of the services have already been introduced by competitors and therefore might gain significant market share by the time TON launching its services.
            As WhatsApp and Facebook messenger already have large market shares among western countries, it might be hard for the project to expand its market share in western countries.
            All TON services are now only concepts and the characteristics of the final system may ultimately be very different from those claimed in WP, especially in terms of network bandwidth.

Team

At the moment, the whole project team is involved in Telegram. Despite the fact that TON and Telegram are strongly interrelated projects, their development should be separated.

Model

In this regard, it is not clear which direction of the development will be the main focus at early stages.
            There is no data on the evaluation of economic effects of each of the indicated areas.

Finance

The given cost distribution is not detailed and only highlights the use of funds.
            The price per customer might be significantly lower than $40 for WhatsApp, as there are many customers of Telegram among countries with oppressive regimes. That is why the valuation of the company is arbitrary.
            Since the outlines of the TON and Telegram projects are very diffused, this can eventually lead to the fact that not the ICO participants, but the founders of Telegram will be the main beneficiaries of the sale process.
            The collected funds will finance Telegram roadmap, which is in fact closely related to TON, but still a different project.

4.2
High
GEMS
Gems is a decentralized, open-sourced, human task crowdsourcing protocol built on top of the Ethereum blockchain.
Start
10.02.2018
End
01.03.2018
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

 The market of online gig economy grew by 26% during the last year, however the part of the market where GEMS will operate - Clerical and data entry - did not grow at all in net terms.

 The micro-tasks market is heavily dominated by large players, such as Amazon Mturk and CrowdFlower.

 Also, there is another ICO entering the micro-tasks market that recently raised 30+ million dollar (Storm).

Product

 There is no information regarding the number of alpha-version users.

 The popularity of GEMS is heavily depending on overall cryptocurrency acceptance and the pace of crypto-to-fiat conversion mechanisms adoption. The main area where GEMS can attract more customers (developing markets) currently does not have convenient tools for crypto payments and conversion.

 The date of token utilization and availability of services to use is not clear.

 Even though GEMS states that they will cope with the problem of multiple verifications of the work done, they do not explain how the problem will be addressed.

 The roadmap given on Medium post does not seem feasible as the team consists of 2 people.

Team

 None of the advisors mention GEMS as their advisory-project on Linkedin.

 Apart from the founders of the project, the team behind GEMS is not clear.

Model

 The business model is only conceptually described so there are no figures that can clarify the commercial viability of the platform.

 The team says that the project will facilitate most of the transactions off-chain in order to pay less for GAS. However, GEMS does not explain how the gas payment will be paid in the end.

 The proposed competitive advantage over traditional platforms is based on the assumption that using GEMS protocol, work providers will hire less workers. This assumption is not proved.

Finance

 The team of the project bans telegram channel users who ask questions about the financial side of GEMS.

 GEMS does not clearly states the financial metrics. The token distribution structure is not completely clear.

 The initial hard cap will be around 18 trillion USD which is tremendously huge number for a new project. As there will be 2B tokens issued, the price per token will be around 9K USD. Therefore, the ROI might be low or even negative.

 According to the same post, 75% of tokens will not be available for sale and will be kept by team. Moreover, there is no information about vesting scheme for the team reserves.

 The project will use Dutch auction model for its token price determination. That is why the probability of a huge price dump when GEM token hits the exchange is very likely.

 There is no information about the time frames of ICO.

2.4
Low
Tolar HashNET
Tolar is an open source, community governed crypto-currency featuring scalable, fast, secure, and fair transactions.
Start
14.09.2018
End
20.09.2018
$ 10 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

High level of competition in the field of scalable blockchains: ICON, EOS, LIsk, Ark, Lisk, Cardano, Hedera, QuarkChain, Zilliqa, Credits.

Product

The Mainnet launch is only expected in Q2 2019. No MVP available. There is no link to GitHub. Whitepaper explains the HashNET Network in a Very Basic Way. The intended product functionality seems too broad and complex for development. The whole list of competitive advantages of Tolar Hashnet over ICON, EOS, LIsk, Ark, Lisk, Cardano, Hedera, QuarkChain, Credits, or Zilliqa is unclear

Team

Now there are no announced partnerships. Only one board member has previous blockchain experience. Other 7 board members have background in management or finance. Not every team members' experience can be validated on LinkedIn. Only 2 out of 8 tech team members have previous blockchain experience. Plenty of the team members came from various roles at COTRUGLI Business School, not from real business.

Model

It is unclear how many tokens will be needed to run a masternode.

Finance

Only 35% of the tokens will be available to investors. The token lockup scheme for the team (20%) and advisors (2.5%) is unclear. High hardcap ($35M) and valuation ($100M) after ICO when compared to competitors(Ziliqa - $20M, Credits - $22M). There is no information about the use of proceeds.

3.2
Medium
Ubex
UBEX is a decentralized advertising exchange, operating on the basis of neural networks with the use of blockchain and smart contracts.
Start
21.05.2018
End
30.08.2018
$ 6 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Except BAT, all other digital advertising blockchain platforms did not gain popularity and have ROI<1

Product

The product development started only in February 2018. Beta version is only expected in January 2019.

Team

There are just 5 developers in the team of 33 members. No neural networks experience. There are no experts in digital advertising within the team. The developers are located in 4 different time zones. They reside in Belgorod, Altai Region, Moldova, and London. The experience of 4 out of 5 developers prior to joining Ubex is unclear. Some of the team members do not claim Ubex as a workplace on LinkedIn.

Model

Now it is only a little information given on the expected fee size. The unit economy is now unclear.

Finance

Maximum transaction volume during the token sale is not set. There is no information about the use of proceeds. The team will give up to 20% bonus for public sale investors but does not lockup the bonus.

3.2
Medium
Akash
Akash - marketplace of idle compute capacity
Start
15.07.2018
End
15.08.2018
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Tough competition among successful blockchain projects

Product

The product is not far different from competitors and does not have any significant edge Only developers are able to test the prototype

Team

The team members are also engaged in Ovelock projects Lack of marketing and legal specialists Only 5 team members

Model

Not sold tokens will not be burnt and will be held by the company for future sales Own token applied has poor rational grounds

Finance

It is not clear how raised funds will be distributed

3.4
Medium
Moonlight
A decentralized platform, built on the NEO network for recruiting and scaling the workforce.
Start
10.06.2018
End
30.06.2018
$ 21 300 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Most of the current projects in this field did not gain significant ROI since ICO.

Product

No beta has been released yet. Overall, the roadmap now looks quite sketchy.

Team

Not every team member has page on LinkedIn. The team members are located in Detroit, Sydney, Singapore, Fort Collins. Some of the team members do not mention Moonlight as a workplace.

Model

The contracts conditions are not given.

Finance

The use of proceeds description is not detailed.

4.2
High
Fantom
Fantom creates a DAG based smart contract platform that solves the issue of scalability and confirmation time of the existing blockchain technology.
Start
15.06.2018
End
28.06.2018
$ 39 800 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Fantom is not the first platform based on DAG. IOTA, Byteball, Nano and Hedera Hashgraph already started developing projects with the same technology. Hedera Hashgraph aims to raise 18M USD, which is twice smaller than Fantom wants to attract.

Product

There is no link to GIthub or other source to track the product development As of May 15th 2018, Beta is not available

Team

Most of the team members are located in Korea, while some key employees are in Australia. One of the senior developers does not have any other experience stated on Linkedin. Not all of the team members have Linkedin profiles.

Model

It is now unclear how the platform will monetize its activity.

Finance

The company valuation - 100M USD - seems comparably high. The team does not clarify what "Market Development" reserved tokens will be spent for. The team gives a split of expenses only for 3 broad categories: Development, Operations, Marketing. This seems as a sketchy distribution.

3.6
Medium
NNS
NNS – service transforming long NEO addresses to short and human-friendly ones
Start
01.01.2018
End
01.07.2018
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

The auction activity may decrease in the 3rd month taking into consideration Ethereum ENS statistics

Product

No sufficient risks were found

Team

LinkedIn profiles are rather formal and do not consist valuable information

Model

The project is incorporated in China causing possible legal problems for investors

Finance

The project is non-profit but it is usual for NEO infrastructural products

4.2
High
Kambria
Kambria is a decentralized open platform for robotics development.
Start
16.06.2018
End
15.07.2018
$ 25 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Kambria is not the first project aiming to create an AI & Robotics development platform on blockchain. Recently, singularity.net and effect.ai, projects working in the same field, conducted ICOs and raised $36M and $13.5M respectively. Singularity.NET has a team of strong AI specialists and already launch Alpha Version of the product. Botchain by Talla is working in the same area and will soon announce Public token sale.

Product

The Beta version is not available and will only be released in June - December 2018. The team does not provide a GitHub link to track the progress of development. The team promised to open source and provide complete KDNA for the entire Ohmni robot to jumpstart the development of Kambria. For 9th of May 2018, it has not yet been published. The given roadmap only describes the product development up until Q1 2019 with just 2 milestones.

Team

All of the co-founders are still employed at Ohnmi Labs - it might be a risk for scaling Kambria. Some of the team members do not state Kambria as a workplace on LinkedIn

Model

The stated fee size might be amended at the later stages of the product development.

Finance

The team will reserve 20% of tokens for itself using vesting scheme. However, this number is comparatively large. The OhmniLabs (which is created by the founders of Kambria) reserves 10% of the tokens, so additional 10% will be held by the core team. The team does not allocate funds for legal issues in its expenses pie chart. The amount of anticipated funds spend on marketing (35%: $4.2M - $12.5M) seems overvalued.

3.6
Medium
Quadrant Protocol
Quadrant Protocol – protocol for checking data authenticity
Start
01.06.2018
End
01.07.2018
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Tough competition with similar blockchain projects Lack of significant edge on competitors

Product

Product overcome authenticity problem and does not allow to change data elements but does not solve the problem of fake raw data Lack of rational grounds to such a long and intricate value chain It is impossible to track project’s development and check the current stage of development

Team

Possible poor focus on the project due to DataStreamX activity Lack of experienced legal and relevant blockchain specialists

Model

Other platforms may be applied but there are no details which ones

Finance

Overestimated hardcap – 20M USD Lack of details regarding the reserve of 20% of tokens

3.8
Medium
CarryProtocol
Carry is a platform that connects offline merchants and consumers, makes personal data fair for everyone and makes marketing clear and effective using blockchain.
Start
26.08.2018
End
09.09.2018
$ 44 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Serviceable addressable market is significantly less, than total offline retail market.

Product

Product is not developed. No unique technology in product.

Team

Almost all team is former Spoqa workers, however, it is hard to prove, that all team is fully involved in Carry Protocol.

Model

Significant investments is needed for implementing such model.

Finance

Hard cap is too high, project is overvalued.

4.2
High
Quark Chain
Quark Chain aims to create a high-throughput blockchain with 1000000+ TPS (Transactions Per Second).
Start
15.05.2018
End
15.06.2018
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Competition in the sphere of scalable dApp-protocols is more severe than in others, so it has to be taken into consideration. In order to solve this problem, several projects have already launched the alternative protocols that aim to significantly increase the throughput of the blockchain protocols. For instance, EOS launched its infrastructure for dApps, which Test Network can sustain over 10,000 TPS. EOS raised 197M during its ICO in June 2017 and now is the 5th largest cryptocurrency in the world by market cap. IOTA is able to process 500-800 TPS, raised 400M and now 11th by market cap in the world of cryptocurrencies. That is why the potential growth and community attention to Quark Chain might be lower.

Product

The test net Alpha Version was released in March 2018 and it supported 2000+ TPS. It is a decent result but it is too far from the declared througput of 1M+ TPS. The product has been in development for 4 months only, according to GitHub. There is no information about patent applications

Team

Some of the declared team members does not have Quark Chain as a workplace on their Linkedin Pages. There are 3 Research Scientists in the project team and it is unclear what roles they have. The team has strong technical background but this experience mainly comes from large corporations. There is no one in the team with track record of launching and scaling startups.

Model

Now there is no information on the expected size of the fee.

Finance

Most of the financial details have not yet been released and are TBA.

4.2
High
Airchain Network
Airchain - a platform implementing blockchain in freight industry
Start
14.05.2018
End
14.06.2018
$ 25 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Tough competition from the established companies Poor Value Proposition for a potential user

Product

Scalability problem due to the poor motivation for third-party travelers and their poor coverage together with possible lack of trust from senders Demo stage of the product with no significant functions working

Team

The lack of industry experience in the team Half of team members do not have LinkedIn profiles

Model

Own token and further own blockchain do not give significant advantages to the product

Finance

High token share for team and advisors – 33% Overestimated Hardcap – 25M USD No financial estimation available No detailed information on funds raised usage

2.4
Low
The Acorn Collective
Crowdfunding platform
Start
26.05.2018
End
24.06.2018
$ 35 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

Currently, project decided to not verify their publishing via system of grades and risks

Product

Currently, project decided to not verify their publishing via system of grades and risks

Team

Currently, project decided to not verify their publishing via system of grades and risks

Model

Currently, project decided to not verify their publishing via system of grades and risks

Finance

Currently, project decided to not verify their publishing via system of grades and risks

3.4
Medium
INGOT Coin
Creating a one-stop-shop Ecosystem that will link the Crypto markets to the current financial markets.
Start
01.07.2018
End
11.08.2018
$ 90 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
Market

INGOT Coin solution will have to compete with IndigeGoGo ICO, Fund Platform, FastInvest, NousPlatform. The regulation behind managing and investing funds might be a significant barrier to growth for INGOT Coin. There are already several projects aiming to create tools simplifying ICO investments, which already raised money. For instance, BankEx which creates PoA protocol to tokenize different types of assets, already raised 70M USD and is about to launch asset-backed exchange. There are already working cryptowallets and crypto-to-fiat exchanges that have large paying customer base. That is why in this industry the probability of success of Ingot coin is very small.

Product

The product development start and the current stage of development is not clear. The product description is long but most of the provided information is redundant and does not make it clear to understand the product advantages. The project claims to provide high levels of liquidity in its proprietary exchange. However, the team does not even give an idea of how this liquidity will be delivered. The project has quite an ambitious roadmap which does not seem feasible. MVP is not available.

Team

There are no specialists with technical background in processing and acquiring data from exchanges. The CEO does not have previous experience in the financial industry. Most of the core team members have business majors and does not have previous technical experience. Most of the team members previously worked at INGOT Group companies, such as SIgma Investments LTD, INGOT Brokers, and others. However, there is no available information about the track record of these companies. There is no CTO in the project. Now, there are just 2 technical specialists in the team, according to their website.

Model

There is no information on the fee size. The business model description is sketchy and does not give a good explanation of how the company will earn. It is unclear how the rest 5 components of the Ecosystem(apart from Exchange) will earn money.

Finance

The soft cap of 35M USD seems to be way above the median figure of comparable companies. The hard cap of 90M USD seems to be way above the median figure of comparable companies. The hard/soft cap ratio is around 3 which allows to assume that the project wants to attract as much money as possible and does not have a clear understanding of required budget. As the company will sell 75% of its tokens, the project valuation will be around 120M USD which is a tremendous value for a project without available MVP.

2.4
Low
3.4
PDX
PDX creates a next-generation public blockchain for infrastructure.
Raising funds
$ 10 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.2
BOLT
Bolt is building a decentralized mobile-focused video content platform.
Raising funds
$ 12 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
2.8
PayGine
PayGine is an open financial platform with an open API used to operate within its proprietary banking structure to serve FinTech and crypto-business.
Raising funds
30 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
2.6
Fysical
Fysical is the infrastructure for the transparent and compliant exchange of location data.
Raising funds
$ 18 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.4
Bottr
Bottr is an ecosystem powered by smart messaging that rewards you for doing and sharing with others what you love and know.
Raising funds
$ 2 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
4.2
Telegram Open Network (TON)
Telegram Open Network (TON) is a fast and inherently scalable multi-blockchain architecture. TON can be regarded as a decentralized supercomputer and value transfer system. By combining minimum transaction time with maximum security, TON can become a VISA/Mastercard alternative for the new decentralized economy.
Raising funds
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
2.4
GEMS
Gems is a decentralized, open-sourced, human task crowdsourcing protocol built on top of the Ethereum blockchain.
Raising funds
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.2
Tolar HashNET
Tolar is an open source, community governed crypto-currency featuring scalable, fast, secure, and fair transactions.
Raising funds
$ 10 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.2
Ubex
UBEX is a decentralized advertising exchange, operating on the basis of neural networks with the use of blockchain and smart contracts.
Raising funds
$ 6 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.4
Akash
Akash - marketplace of idle compute capacity
Raising funds
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
4.2
Moonlight
A decentralized platform, built on the NEO network for recruiting and scaling the workforce.
Raising funds
$ 21 300 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.6
Fantom
Fantom creates a DAG based smart contract platform that solves the issue of scalability and confirmation time of the existing blockchain technology.
Raising funds
$ 39 800 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
4.2
NNS
NNS – service transforming long NEO addresses to short and human-friendly ones
Raising funds
N/A
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.6
Kambria
Kambria is a decentralized open platform for robotics development.
Raising funds
$ 25 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.8
Quadrant Protocol
Quadrant Protocol – protocol for checking data authenticity
Raising funds
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
4.2
CarryProtocol
Carry is a platform that connects offline merchants and consumers, makes personal data fair for everyone and makes marketing clear and effective using blockchain.
Raising funds
$ 44 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
4.2
Quark Chain
Quark Chain aims to create a high-throughput blockchain with 1000000+ TPS (Transactions Per Second).
Raising funds
$ 20 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
2.4
Airchain Network
Airchain - a platform implementing blockchain in freight industry
Raising funds
$ 25 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
3.4
The Acorn Collective
Crowdfunding platform
Raising funds
$ 35 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
2.4
INGOT Coin
Creating a one-stop-shop Ecosystem that will link the Crypto markets to the current financial markets.
Raising funds
$ 90 000 000
Market
Product
Team
Model
Finance
1
2
3
4
5
6
Load more
Social networks
© ICO Scoring - ICO Analytical platform backed by investors and financial experts. All rights reserved 2018